This Anarchist Group Seems Suspiciously Organised

What do you mean ‘We have a plan’? Doesn’t that go against everything you stand for?

A group of anarchists quite clearly did not read the definition of ‘anarchist’.

Not to be confused with antichrist which is described as someone supremely evil.

As per google, the definition of anarchist is ‘a person who tries to bring about anarchy’. Obviously that’s not clear enough so another google search was required. Anarchy. A state of disorder.

So having a well-written manifesto with clearly defined goals seems oddly at odds with what they had been titled. Yes, they themselves had not chosen to brand themselves as reckless dangers to society, but the exposé done on them by a bad faithed opponent seemed trustworthy enough.

But what of the argument that you can not search for disorder in an orderly way?

One disgruntled joinee said, “when I signed up, they made me fill up a bunch of forms. Forms! Unnervingly organised. All I wanted to do was throw trashcans around. Now, they’re telling me that that’s not what they’re all about!”

“They keep talking about systemic change, the media kept calling then anarchists, shouldn’t we not want ‘systemic’ anything? I’m beginning to think framing this group as agents of chaos was really misleading cos I joined with the sole intention of messing shit up. Although, I guess intending anything at all does go against the concept of anarchy? It’s not a very clearly defined concept for some reason.”

We were able to speak to the person ranked third in charge in their very detailed hierarchy chart who said, “That’s just a smear campaign. We are not anarchists, we have a heirarchy chart.”